Family Research Council shooting to be used to demonize gays

There are many reasons why I find it hard to believe that Floyd Corkins II acted out of his own hatred for the anti-gay hate group. Until I receive really good evidence that Corkins acted out of his own volition I am holding out in saying that this event was authentic and/or "domestic terrorism."

Here are some few thoughts:

• Immediately conservatives have labeled this as "domestic terrorism" yet cannot point to any specific evidence of this being the case. The FBI has stated that no motive has been dealt with yet. And the motive will be important because conservatives are ready and willing to blame this event on gay people no matter what.
• My own private investigator has done some research and determined that the shooter has no criminal record and has volunteered at the DC gay center. If the event was staged as it could have been, then choosing a gay man to do the shooting can help make the screenplay more believable. The PI has also done a psychological profile on the shooter upon my request, and he determined that this 'acting out' is totally out of character. The investigator is trained in forensics and criminal psychological profiling, who has trained thousands of police officers across the nation. After hanging up the phone on him I am beginning to believe that maybe, just maybe he did not act alone.
• The whole Chick-Fil-A bag is also something that really stands out to me. Was this shooter pulling off a 'political stunt?' But the bag does take away whatever seriousness of 'domestic terrorism' the MSM is trying to portray. It just looks Mickey Mousey to me. Just like when the Colorado lesbians who also faked and staged their own 'domestic terrorism' against their property over a beef they had with the homeowner's association by labeling their garage door with anti-gay vandalism, missing some very expensive areas of the house which a REAL vandal would have struck. You see, if a lesbian couple in Colorado with no resources can be able to pull off a fake hate crime incident, so too can an organization like the Family Research Council who has a huge war chest, government connections, and political ties to Washington lawmakers. Plus, the Chick-Fil-A factor may be used to up the sales at the anti-gay chicken joint and try to raise its already dwindling popularity. In the end, these types of incidents there are always going to be winners, and in this case is the Family Research Council and Chick-Fil-A. To be honest, I wouldn't be surprised if Chick-Fil-A was the one behind the shooting itself by coercing the shooter (just like previous shooters) to carry out the event, carrying one of their bags to make it look like the shooter was acting out of hatred for Chick-Fil-A's anti-gay values. 
• Then you have Fox Nation saying that 'CONSERVATIVES' were being fired at, when clearly that was not the case, it was an ARMED guard that got shot in the arm and whose political affiliations are not known to us.
• The media hype is also quite laughable. Where is this hype when a gay center gets vandalized? Nowhere. Being that most of the hype comes from the right I would have to say that conservatives are interested in using this event for political gain than finding out what truly happened. So I guess now we must claim that every act against gay people must considered 'domestic terrorism' and we must therefore blame conservatives as well. Okay, fine.
• Lets not forget that it was just yesterday that a conservative minister was found guilty of aiding in international kidnapping of a lesbian's daughter. The shooting has totally dominated that bit of news today. Coincidence? Being that Liberty University has their finger prints all over this kidnapping and have financial ties to Family Research Council.
• It is possible that this maniac that shot the guard may or MAY NOT BE GAY. If he was passing off as an intern at the FRC lobby he could as well try to pass off as being gay at the DC center for a while. If he is crazy enough to try to shoot people at the heavily guarded FRC headquarters, he is crazy enough to build this persona. The investigator could not confirm for how long he volunteered at the center, but he said that if such info is not available then probably he was not there for a good length of time. 
• And lastly, why I think FRC (as opposed to Chick-Fil-A) could be behind this shooting and calling it 'domestic terrorism' is because its leader, Tony Perkins, used to be a government intel officer working in ... guess? Anti-terrorism and tactics. 

Again I am only speculating on things that are possible, but most likely probable based on known facts at this time. People in history had to go to very high extremes to win public opinion or debate, including engaging in false flag attacks.

If it turns out that this event was 'legit' then we have a another problem in our hands, but I wouldn't worry about it until we have SUFFICIENT evidence proving such. For now, my natural instincts tell me that there's something fishy behind this event. People should not just buy what the MSM says, but immerse themselves in the facts, leaving all possible conclusions open.