NO, Jesus is NOT The Son of God... Can't Happen

I really don't care for debating the nuances of certain Christian beliefs. I find that certain Christian teachings are helpful rather than pouncing on anybody that disagrees on the resurrection of Jesus.

Tonight a Jehovah's Witness knocked on my door. He was very cute, maybe too young for me (he was probably 18-19 years old). I know this bit. I used to be a JW myself. So I know the script. But it is very odd to find a Witness knocking on my door this evening on a weekday.

The handsome boy was a bit nervous as he tried to explained to me all about Jesus' resurrection and the meaning of Easter. Now, it appears, they are dragging people to what is called the 'Memorial' where they get to pass out wine and bread and somehow celebrate Christ's last supper this way. I was thinking of going only maybe to hang out with this cute dude, though in Jehovah's cult as I call them, homosexuality is not permitted. Which makes the whole thought even more raunchy and nasty.

But one thing did made cutie boy react and found a sort of interest in my intellectual nudity. You see he was bragging about how Jesus was the son of God. Then it popped into my head: God is a man. A man cannot have a son. That is not right. And in fact, it is kind of, well... gay.

So I told him just that. He was bit awe struck. He looked like a deer caught in headlights. Maybe he's gay too? In Jehovah's cult a lot of guys are gay or at least like to do the nasty with other guys. I know because I been there.

He just didn't know how to respond. Although he left me his number right before his pompous dad showed up to check on him. He said that I had a 'very interesting' question. Interesting? How about relevant? How CAN a man like GOD actually have a child without a woman? Because we're told that god made man in his image and after his likeness, and since Jesus fans all around the world worship heterosexual fertility, one must assume that god is a heterosexual man. And when was the last time we ever saw a heterosexual man deliver a child? (No counting Arnold Schwarzenegger of course).

No, that simply cannot happen unless god happens to be a female to male pre-op transgender. Then, yeah, maybe.

Oh. And I'm not sure if I want to call this dude. Usually they are not supposed to give numbers out like that, but maybe, who knows. Maybe he wants to see if men are in fact incapable of getting pregnant. And of course there is only one way to find out. He he he.

Such Arrogant Bigotry From The Turds at NOM

If you are in court fighting a ticket or fighting to keep gays out of the altar, it is best to make sure you don't piss of the judge, especially the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court.

Well the Chairman of the anti-gay organization NOM basically fucked up his case, big time. NOM's inherit bigotry on child rearing shows its true ugly face. NOM touts itself as just trying to keep marriage to heterosexual couples only. Okay, fine, whatever. But to personally attack someone's kids, now you are just a fucking despicable degenerate.

My parents raised me well. Despite what anti-gay bigots want to think or say to the contrary, my parents gave me the skills in order to operate peacefully and cordially with other humans (unless you are pricks like NOM is showing itself to be). One of their teachings was to never, EVER, get your enemy's kids involved. Leave the kids alone.

But NOM has no respect for the children, even though they so foolishly claim so in some of their retarded SNL ready commercials. They basically hate children and are only obsessed with procreation. And that's what it is.

Gays or straights who adopt children are not the problem, nor are kids the pool of which we dip our frustrations in. The problem is that many adults have failed our children, big time. We abuse them, lose them, and neglect them, which is why these kids end up in adoption agencies.

And today the human race has sunk into a new level - not only do adults abuse and neglect our most vulnerable members of society but now they are attacking them for simply being taken care off by loving responsible adults like gays and Chief Justice Roberts.

Let me just say, any parent whose kids are called "second best" will be rightly fumed with anger. And I wouldn't mind holding Brian Brown down, or his selfish coward of a Chairman, while Chief Justice Roberts rip their asses apart and takes their eyes out of their sockets. Or at least, Roberts will most likely have the clowns of NOM in his mind while voting on the gay marriage cases in the Justices' conference room.

John Roberts, you have my permission to throw the book at these knuckleheads, both figuratively and well, kick ass mode speaking.

You just don't mess with the kids. Leave the kids alone. They've already been through enough.

Oh Marco Rubio, Cry me a River

Funny how conservatives always try to lecture gays to be "thick skinned" when it comes to being name-called, and to quit whining about it. Supposedly conservatives are supposed to be against "self victimization" and hate those who vest themselves with that label. And let us not forget that these are the same conservatives who say that people have a right to bark whatever they want without any exterior consequences.

Yet GOP and teabagger darling Marco Rubio is forgoing all of that and instead now insists that he's the victim in the gay marriage debate, not gays who are having their economic rights and legal protections denied to them. Only in America can a privileged, successful, republican senator with potential to run for the White House can feel as the "real victim."

The new zinger for the teabaggers is that they hate being called "bigots" for having bigoted views. And Rubio is joining that bandwagon, and at C-PAC he whined and moaned about being called a bigot for trying to deny equal protection and economic rights for gay couples.

I don't believe he's genuinely concerned about being called a bigot. Like other teabaggers, Rubio wants to be called a bigot in order to shift the debate over towards the proper use of the word. Clearly this tactic is to make gay people look like Nazis preying on meek, humble Christians (even though Jesus had negative views on politicians in general).

This is why his pathetic plea not to be called a bigot is pure bullshit. The word itself is not a slur. It is a neutral term to describe a person's state of mind regarding a particular subject matter.

Yes Marco, you are a BIGOT on gay marriage. Why? Its not because I hate you or anything like that, it is because your stale arguments against gay marriage are not based on anything but your narrow worldview and your inability to understand what being gay is all about. That's the only reason why you are a bigot on this issue (and on many other ones too). You have given us reasons why you oppose gay marriage, I've analyzed those reasons and basically they are not backed by hard facts, science or psychology.

Don't worry Marco, you're not the only one. The difference between me and other gays is that I at least recognize my bigotry. There are certain things I do not know about. I do not know what exactly is going on with my ex's life right now. We don't talk anymore. That makes me BIGOTED on his life because I have certain narrow perceptions on what he's doing versus actually trying to find out for sure.

So Marco, quit your whining. It's not working.