Obama Presides Over First Cabinet Meeting And Tells Everybody to Get Ready For His Satan Sandwich

Obama had his first meeting of his second term with his cabinet by reminding everybody of the pending doom of his satan sandwich compromise he made with the fascist teabaggers in the form of a sequester.

During a depression the government cannot, or should not, cut spending and shrink productivity. Such sequestration is detrimental to any recovery and could push us into another recession during this current depression. These massive cuts will in the end increase the deficit and the debt-ratio on our GDP. Obama should know this, but because he's too weak and he's in the pockets of big business and wall street and the federal reserve he had to capitulate to the fascist teabagger maniacs of the house republicans.

The Obama deception is pretty clear: provide left cover so he can impose European style austerity on the country. We need to invest in the economy and move from a petty cheap economy to a technological one that can increase productivity, wages, tax revenues which will shrink the deficit and debt.

Religious Reactionary Bursts CIA Op Tony Perkins' Bubble With Reality

During the CIA op and terrorism professional extraordinaire Tony Perkins' no ratings radio show his audience of two people had their bubbles burst when the CEO of the National Religious Broadcasters (bible salesmen union) most likely unwittingly admitted that DOMA is doomed in court:


But I'm guessing Tony already knows this, but still he's probably pissed that this little bible selling minion admitted to the truth on his show since Tony's big paycheck is financed by gullible people who donate money to his altar boy hate club and are feared into believing that Jesus is coming to destroy Chick-Fil-A if they don't pucker up and help fight the homo agenda and defend DOMA by shelling out some green.

Tony's supporters should then ask themselves, if they are actually any smarter than what they are right now (which I doubt), where is all the money they are giving to these circus clowns going towards if they know that DOMA is going to be struck down? You do know that Tony drives around in a $80K car? Oh, but don't worry you silly Huckabee worshiper, he got a 20% discount on that car by showing his CIA ID card at the dealership (CIA ops do get discounts for their personal vehicles). So you dumb hicks didn't have to pay that much.

Teabaggers in The House Want to Protect Religious Freedom by Banning Religious Freedom

Get it? I don't.

But yet, here we go again. Last week proto-fascist teabaggers introduce in the house once more a bill that would ban military chaplains from officiating at gay weddings (not marriages because DOMA already does that) on military installations. Reason? Religious freedom of course!

This twisting of reality to try and weasel in an anti-gay bill by ironically trying to defend the "religious freedom" of military personnel gave me a chuckle.

By the way, where the hell did they get this idea of "religious freedom?"

Teabagger answer: "Fram dem constushion man!"

But yet let us recall that in the past these same Orwellian teabgger lunatics were defending the ouster of loyal gay service members under the guise that soldiers "did not have a constitutional right to free speech," and that they were supposed to "focus on the job and not on sexuality." Well, the repeal of Don't Ask Don't Tell went without a hitch and now nobody has to worry about their sexuality, basically declaring it a non-issue.

But these perverted teabaggers are obsessed with gay sex and homosexuality, ironically. Now they are the ones "sexuallizing the military" by bringing this issue up again front and center (and shoving it down my throat if I may add). The first sentence of the bill that these fucknuts are proposing makes reference to gay butt sex. Doth protest too much?

These gay sex obsessed toe-tapping pervs need to answer this question for me: Yes or No, do soldiers have constitutional rights (like the first amendment that you so loudly defend in your pathetic bill), or are sodomites the only ones that are excluded from such rights and therefore we must ban them from exercising their freedom of speech by acting out a holy wedding and exchanging their vows on base?

You can't have it both ways. Unless you are a fascist teabagger in Congress of course.

Hypocritical Religious Right Wingers Are All About Breaking the Law

A zealot fascistic Mennonite pastor who is facing a jail sentence for being involved in the kidnapping of a lesbian's daughter is now saying that he was following "God's Law." Basically these fanatics are saying, as they always do: "we can break the law as long as I invoke my god."

These so-called Christian Crusaders are so wrong about law and order that any sane person would reject their theocracy as evil. Demonic dictators in the past have said that "God" was on their side when they were committing the most heinous crimes against humanity.

But this perverted defiance is also very much hypocritical. These people yell and scream when a lesbian couple rightly tries to engage in public commerce by daring to buy a wedding cake and thus the fanatic Christian baker broke the law by engaging in discrimination that is very much prohibited. The prop 8 proponents have broken the law many times in the State of California for failing to adequately report their donations, their defense is that they "simply forgot" because their work is sanctioned by the all mighty.

Yet these very same people were having a fit when then Mayor of San Francisco Gavin Newsom was illegally issuing marriage licenses to gay couples. The Mayor broke the law and he was ordered to stop (which he did) and the licenses were rightfully (I mean a legal sense) revoked. We obey the laws. We adhere to rules, regulations and court rulings. They don't. Since Gavin's stunt nobody else, not even gay people in power to do so, has violated the law by illegally issuing marriage licenses to gay people even though said denial "goes against their beliefs."

I call bullshit on this delusional and child kidnapping idiot pastor.

Minnesota Anti-Gays Wasting Their Not So Precious Time in Protesting

Seriously? These people are beyond delusional. In this pathetic article at Christian Post we learn that anti-gays are going to protest against Minnesota lawmakers' plans to legalize gay marriage even though there no guarantees of immediate passage.

Somebody really needs to look into picking up a different hobby besides meaningless gay bashing. Sure you have the right to protest. Much more like the right to be stupid. And that is the point I am trying to make here.

In the article, the editors posted a pic of a NYC protest against gay marriage demanding to "let the people vote" nonsense. Is it to further the cause of these muppets? They think that is what they are doing but in reality that are just looking like a bunch of do-nothings who want to beat an already buried dead horse to death some more.

Didn't Minnesota already vote on this issue? The voters in a clear victory said NO to gay marriage ban. The question was about banning gay marriage, if the voters did not want gay marriage legalized they would have approved the constitutional amendment. Anybody thinking otherwise is feasting on delusion.

Hey guys, we've already "let the people vote." And we won, you lost. Get over it.

Nat Geo Channel Should DUMP The Scouts' Fruity Show

Today GLAAD and an Eagle Scout delivered a petition with 120,000 signatures to the National Geographic Network headquarters demanding that a disclaimer be aired at the beginning of each episode of 'Are You Tougher Than a Boy Scout' stating that Nat Geo does not endorse anti-gay discrimination.

First off, the whole premise of the reality show is pretty lame and sounds uninteresting and kinda fruity. Although I would rather like to see something like 'Are Gays Tougher Than a Boy Scout?' That would be more interesting and would in fact garnered more ratings because, well, straight male audiences don't want to see themselves as much on TV. They like to watch funny and witty gays, sexy and hot chicks, explosions, car crashes, homeless men fighting over an expired can of olives, and Peter Griffin farting on Meg's face on their TV screens. Sorry if that sounds juvenile but that is what the most important targeted TV audience wants to see and it is something a TV network should know about. But just to have have some heterosexual dupes trying to compete with fruity teenagers in camp uniforms is really stupid, and a bad show idea. Whoever pitched this ludicrous idea to Nat Geo should be taken out into the street and shot in front of their families.

The above reason alone should be enough for the proper nixing of this dumb show and throwing all video copies of it into a black hole where they will be "spaghettified." But if you really want to get at these ignorant and out of touch Network execs on the whole gay-scout-ban thing then of course we could make the case that anti-gay discrimination is really wrong, stupid, weird and yes... fruity.

But the misguided Network is defending its grotesque decision to their "the show must go on" position saying that the Network itself does not support discrimination of gays. Scalia Mussolini comes to mind: "DON'T BELIEVE IT"...

They are indeed supporting and endorsing anti-gay discrimination by giving this fruity club of men and boys with funny uniforms who shit in holes in the ground in the forest a platform. Forget that they say that the anti-gay issue is not part of the show because IT IS.

Point in fact: the Scouts went to the Supreme Court and said that excluding gays was and is what makes them 'The Boy Scouts.' In other words, anti-gay discrimination is the central thesis to their organization. This is further emphasized by those who support the ban saying that anti-gay discrimination is "central" to scouting because it reinforces the Scout oath (this is really fruity now) that boys must be "morally straight." So yes, the Boy Scouts are an anti-gay organization because they have admitted to that fact in front of everybody in Court.

Next the History Channel will explore ancient aliens and the KKK, because you know, History Channel "doesn't" support racial discrimination.