Amazing Bravery at Newton Connecticut School Shooting

Stop the Politicizing of Dead Children!

The nation is mourning over the tragedy in Connecticut in which 28 people including 20 kindergarteners were shot dead by a deranged gunman.

What's even more deranged and beyond lunacy is the relentless injection of political talking points by both sides over guns and gun control. YES WE GET IT. Your arguments have always been the same no matter what, but using this tragedy to push whatever agenda you have is really pathetic. The bodies are still warm, the parents of these defenseless kids have not even buried them yet and hacks are ranting on and on about guns and the 2nd amendment. This is a heartless, shameful distraction from the fact that 28 families' lives have been turned upside down from now on.

Our thoughts should be about them, not somebody's pompous statements meant to score political points with certain cults and followings that only serve their selfish egos. Stop being selfish and arrogant.

Let these families and the town that has been struck by this tragedy mourn in peace. They do not want nor need your foaming at the mouth dithers about gun rights and statistics. Unlike you and your arrogant bubble that you live in they are now painfully planning the funerals of their children.

This debate has been ongoing for years on end. Can we just for a couple of days give it a rest while people mourn? Can you at least afford them that? Do you politicos have some decency to spare?

Lunatic Nigel Farage of UKIP Lives in His Own Bubble

UKIP's  fascist lunatic "libertarian" dictator Nigel Farage who has in the past said that gay marriage is not really an issue for libertarian parties like UKIP, has made a complete u-turn and has vowed to exploit conservative party sentiment over the issue and take away votes. Why does he think that? Well, because his drinking buddies at his pub are so upset by David Cameron's plans to legalize gay marriage that whatever these drunkards say the rest of the British people must also follow (another sign of fascist inclinations.)

These are the same delusional drunks that predicted that UKIP will take seats in Parliament in the last election. So far UKIP has won this many seats.

Whether or not they can claim that there is supposed support for this fascist party is one thing, but actually pulling it off is another. And one thing we must ask: What is Fuhrer Farage going to get in the end from this? Surely is NOT seats in Westminster. But since they are taking a very harsh fascist stance against allowing religious gays from having weddings at their religious facilities (minority religious oppression - another sign of fascist inclinations) I can only imagine that they are now going to attract those who also agree in oppressing gay people, whether religious or non-religious. In the end they are going to end up being the party of homophobes, even surpassing the infamous British National Party.

But I want to leave you with this conservative columnist's response to Farage's lunacy and border-line desperation posted in the London Telegraph:

A statesman speaks. Mr Farage has the pulse of the nation, and the nation is saying “enough”.

Though enough of what, isn’t quite clear. Enough gay marriage? We haven’t got gay marriage. Enough homosexuality in general?

...

If you went into my local pub you’d hear people talking about Charlton Athletic Football Club, the Blitz Map (three of Hitler’s bombs missed it by a couple of hundred yards), and the new restaurant that’s just opened up on the corner. If you started banging on about gay marriage, the threat to religious freedom and how it was all the final straw, you’d be drinking on your own.

If you went into my favourite pub in Greenwich you probably could find people talking about the proposed legislation – but it would mostly be students from Greenwich University who support the idea. And if you wandered about five minutes up the road to our own George and Dragon the drinkers there would definitely be in favour: it ‘s a gay pub.

The problem with forming your world view from your local is that’s it’s not a world view. It’s a tiny, insular, self-selecting focus group. Nigel Farage drinks in a pub in a village populated by lots of other Nigel Farages. Not even a spokesman for little England, but a tribune of Little Britain.

One would have to wonder what is going on in Farage's delusional mind. 

Oh and the few UKIP homos that have actually decided to join and form their very own fascist club for gays (supporting all the backwards fascist feudalistic austerity plans of their party including allowing discrimination against gays in areas of public/private service and accommodations) have decided to write a letter to the party heads.

No, no, no. You guys got it wrong. Don't waste your time with a stupid letter. You should join Farage's pub, then you will have voice, because it seems to me that Farage thinks that the whole of your country is only confined to his fruity pub.

What a joke.

BREAKING: Uruguay Lower House Approves Gay Marriage Bill

While the British are going through tantrum fits, and British conservatives are at each other throats... While thousands of French homophobes take to the streets to protest against gay marriage, I mean how dare they want to get married right? How dare you gay Germans ask for equal tax treatments! Now fuck off! Nein Nein Nein!!!

While "progressive" Europeans are running around like a bunch of fucking headless chickens and showing their true Nazi colors, lawmakers in Uruguay have already approved a gay marriage bill and it is heading its way to the Senate where it is expected to pass and be signed by the president next year.

Yes, just like that they went for it. No fuss. No drama. No 'look at me I kicked a gay man's ass and therefore I am not a homophobe' bullshit shenanigans. No thousands of citizens prancing around like a bunch of fruitcakes in tights dancing to their homophobia.

Way to go Uruguay. I think its going to take this side of the Atlantic to show progress on this and other issues. Already the Mexican Supreme court has paved the way for gay marriage across the country and Colombia is poised on passing legislation as well.

The Church of England will be banned from performing gay weddings, still many British people are pissing their pants over this issue.

Take that you whiny Europeans. 

Gay Days at MSNBC

Is it Gay Days at MSNBC? Tweety Bird had two separate segments on gay marriage on his show 'Hardball'.

MONDAY: Tweety talks to gay republican head honcho Clarke Cooper, though not a rough and tough fascist like many in his party, he still passes off as naive that his party will support gay marriage or stop being so opposed to it. That possibility has come and gone as we keep seeing republicans want to be more anti-gay in order - in their warped minds - to win elections.

 

FRIDAY:  Tweety covers the gay marriage cases pending before the supreme court with Chad Griffin and a gay activist. Chad was not that good here, but then again, that's just me. I forget that this is MSNBC and for the most part Chad is basically preaching to the choir so much effort wasn't made on his part in this interview.

BREAKING: Opposition to Gay Marriage Driven By 'Faith And Bible'

No shit, Sherlock. It doesn't take a brain fucking surgeon to figure that one out.

Yet somebody actually bothered to write it as a headline.

Next: Gay Men Obtain Gym Memberships.

Death of Jenni Rivera Sad For Many of Us

We are mourning the loss of Mexican-American singer Jenni Rivera. She has died in a plane crash in Mexico. She has been very instrumental in helping combat bullying and harassment of gay people, especially those in the Latino community.

GLAAD is also sad.

I am sad. (go to my YouTube channel and see for my response)

Oh well.

Rest in Peace my dear.

FYI: Two Cases Still Pending Before SCOTUS

A little reminder that SCOTUS is still considering two more cases related to gay rights. Since the announcement last week of the two major cases (prop 8 and DOMA) we've sort of forgotten that gay employees of Arizona are fighting the fascist Governor, Jan Brewer, who wants to take away their spousal benefits. Her reasoning is that these benefits cost money (and a fighting a lawsuit all the way to SCOTUS doesn't huh?) and are a 'waste.'

In that case what's stopping this lunatic governor from cutting those necessary benefits from other employees who are NOT gay? Because Brewer is saying that she's cutting these benefits simply for fiscal reasons (and adherence to the Austrian school of economics) and not because these employees are gay and cannot legally marry. If that is the reason, there is no stopping this woman from destroying straight families' economic security in Arizona as well.

She must be stopped.

Fascist Racist Mormon Church Rolls Out New Site, Turns Out to be an 'Ex-Gay' Hangout

There's been a lot of talk about a new website launched by the fascist reactionary anti-gay Church of Latter Day Saints or the Mormons.

Mormon operatives have been able to infiltrate many institutions including the CIA and FBI and create a deception that they are just meek followers of Christ, which they are not. Mormons have been behind the Civil War, racism in the south, John Birch Society, declared war on America through an 'oath of vengeance' for the death of their dubious, fraudulent, dictator prophet Joseph Smith who ran for president under the promise to run a 'theocratic dictatorship' - for more on this please read this important book. Its a must read to learn about the Mormon Deception and what the Church's real motives are.

Mormons are also behind so called 'Ex-Gay' therapies - including electroshock therapy.  They are also financial backers of The National Organization for Marriage, who uses racist tactics, and even has been accused by a prominent black supporter of being racist. The Mormon Church is known for this. They even believe that racial discrimination is inspired by God.

So when the news came out that they have launched a new website aiming towards "gay Mormons" I can only believe this to be another of their many deceptive tactics to fool people that they are now more "compassionate" and "understanding" of gays.

My skepticism is proven correct as the site will mainly feature "Ex-Gay" quacks playing doctor as "therapists" who have "married" other poor misguided Mormons of the opposite sex, like this one.

It is furthered strengthened by the following interview of another Mormon who is participating in the website. You guessed it - another "Ex-Gay" quack peddling his discredited pseudo-therapy. Noticed how nervous he is and how he refuses to look straight into the camera. I doubt he even believes this Mormon lie of deception himself.
 

I would like to warn everybody else of Mormons participating in any gay event or organization as clearly their motives may not be the same as those who support the rights of gays. This may seem harsh to some but if you look at it this way, Mormons are not in general interested in building bridges with anybody. Their main goal is to do plenty of free PR as much as possible. This is the deception doctrine. Even if some Mormons appear to be "pro-gay", they cannot. Their Church teaching is pretty clear that accepting homosexuality is wrong and sinful and against their doctrine. Those who defy this doctrine are subject to penalties including removal from the Church. Mormons who march in gay parades are free to do so but are in clear violation of Church doctrine and cannot be seen as a "Mormon action" or "Mormons marching in the gay parade." They are for the most part "people who Identify as Mormons who are not in line with the Church." Some of these marchers were in fact former Mormons, in that case it shouldn't be a problem. But watch out for those who are loyal to this fascist reactionary church.

ANNOYING: Right Wing Reactionary Republicans Contradict Themselves on Gay Marriage

Right wing fascist Attorney General of Indiana says his state will weigh in and file briefs on the prop 8 gay marriage case pending before the US Supreme court, saying:

 "Indiana stands firm in its vigorous defense of each state's legal authority to recognize the traditional definition of marriage as a significant state interest."(highlights by me)

This is totally untrue or at least contradictory being that the republican party supports adopting a federal constitutional amendment which in essence will prohibit each state from recognizing the 'traditional definition' of gay marriage and will instead be bound to this national amendment.

The fascist AG is not being honest here. His party supports banning gay marriage nationally and prohibit states from any 'legal authority' on the subject at all.

So much for 'states rights.'

COMMENT: How UKIP, and Libertarianism, has failed the gay community

Though libertarianism tries to addresses the need to protect the freedoms of two contradiction factions: an established hierarchy (like the church) and individuals, it cannot address an ugly symptom of human nature: that of hatred and discrimination. For the libertarian any kind of hatred and discrimination should not only be allowed but be protected by the government. In essence, the group that has been marginalized by a tyrannical majority would be able to be oppressed with the blessings of the government. This is coming from a former Libertarian Party USA member who was active for almost a decade.

The libertarian principles have been, for the last couple of years, put to the test in my mind as to how a real libertarian world would actually work and manifest itself. To make it short I would say that these principles and philosophies (which are different from policies and laws) cannot actually work in the real world. Just like the fake promises of Communism and Socialism, Libertarianism can only work "if everybody got along and work together in a homogeneous fashion," meaning if the ultra-rich were actually generous, poverty would no doubt be eradicated over night. But that is not reality. In the real world we see the ultra rich trying to avoid paying taxes that are used to support our modern and civilized society. If they are not willing to pay into society to make it better for everyone when the law mandates it god only knows what would happen if there weren't such a law.

I have come to the conclusion that the Libertarian school offers really no real solutions to today's problems, rather it has become more of a cult (which should be a red flag for any sane libertarian, but it isn't) and romanticism of the old wild west in America and a throwback to the Holy Roman Empire where lords reigned over pieces of land in which they were allowed to do whatever they wanted, from polygamy to slavery, they did it all, even at the expense of wider society as this philosophy of letting the over-lords (or "landlords") rule as they might creates what we call serfdom.

I don't believe in serfdom. I believe in the advancement of the human species in science and technology - one day the human race will travel to the stars. Libertarianism is an antithesis to human progress as it tries to hold hostage political will and power and give it to those who are privileged enough to afford it. No matter what government does, it is evil - according to libertarians. Since government is the only place where the common man can obtain power to protect himself from the powers of the rich elite oligarchy, the libertarians want the common people, the labor force, and those who are not members of country clubs to have no power over their destiny.

It is easy to say that libertarian principles are in fact self contradicting. Saying that one can believe in liberty yet take it to the extreme by allowing the oligarchy to run wild, without oversight, to loot and take hold of our society through their powerful wealth and at the same time demand that social services be cut or demolished leading to genocidal austerity against the people which, if we read our history correctly, has lead to the rise of dictatorships in our past, is, to put it mildly, ironic. This is the libertarian paradox.

The rise of UKIP in the United Kingdom should give the British great concern. The United Kingdom Independence Party sells itself as a libertarian party for the British people. But UKIP has acted in a very peculiar, if not totally self destructive, way when it presents itself to the public. What UKIP is selling you is a totally foreign imposition on the people of Great Britain. It is the Frankenstein of Libertarianism, one where the rich oligarchs of the City Of London would most benefit from (and of course are huge backers of the party) taking its lead from right wing reactionism of America and a nice dose of Austrian economics. Its charismatic leader, Nigel Farage, would be too extreme even for the United States libertarians. Here we have somebody who has essentially become the class clown of the European Parliament with his quite embarrassing antics which are in fact the center of gravity for Faragemania, making them more noticeable than whatever Farage had to actually say.

Gay people have been drawn to the Libertarian movement due to its promise of "individual freedom" translating into supporting total freedoms including the right to marry. Without considering the other ill themes of the movement, this promise has been very enticing to gays and lesbians. So when I heard a few years ago that gay people were joining this new libertarian party in England I didn't really pay much attention until I keep hearing reports of homophobic incidents that are growing in intensity within the party. Soon UKIP hired an openly gay chairman in London, and took a picture of a gay UKIPer burning up a picture of the party's political opponent who was also openly gay in Soho. These stunts really came out of left field for this former Libertarian. The Libertarian Party of America, for what I can recall, never bothered with these publicity stunts nor did they bother trying to appoint a token gay to some high position simply to make the party look like its gay friendly. In practice American Libertarians were in deed pro-gay and supported many gay causes (much of it "in spirit" only) that they didn't need token gays to march with the purple British Pound logo on their rainbow flags. The American faction did not have a prominent homophobia problem, which then leads me to suspect the intentions of UKIP and their parading around of these token gays.

It seems to me the party is trying too hard to do what it should already be enshrined in their inner culture. If its a real Libertarian Party it should without a doubt support same-sex marriage and at the same time support churches who want to perform such marriages to do them while exempting those who do not. That is religious freedom. But what we are witnessing here is a complacency with hierarchy, and with regards to the issue of gay marriage, the church hierarchy. This is the first time I've seen a Libertarian party going Full Monty and actually brazenly cozy up to hierarchy and the elite in full public view. This was not supposed to happen until they obtain power. Hence why it is very important for gay people in the UK to make sure this party never reaches Downing Street. Once in power, UKIP will unleash others to impose on vulnerable minorities like the LGBT community. Say bye to health care, equality laws, economic benefits, and yes, even the very prized Civil Partnerships. The party is opposed to gay marriage because it offends and supposedly infringes on the rights of the right wing reactionaries of the Church (both Anglican and Catholic as they are in alliance together). Remember this is the same church that is still against any form of recognition or rights for gay couples, call your union whatever you want - they are opposed to it, period. If Farage and company can fathom a slippery slope of a sneaky European Court forcing churches to perform gay marriages if they are legalized, then one can easily also construct a more plausible and provable situation in which UKIP will have to give the Church what it wants and destroy all the work and rights we have gained all for their perverse version of "religious freedom."

UKIP will also support and protect discriminators. Under the basis of "property rights" anybody can discriminate against anybody, and it is not restricted to obscure B&Bs, or gays for that matter. Since the party believes in privatizing everything, including hospitals and schools, the oligarchs of the Church would be very content on buying up property in order to pursue their fanatic made up right to discriminate against gays, even in hospitals, in order, as one Catholic Cardinal told me once, "to shape you people up." Yes, under UKIP white supremacists can buy up restaurants and hotels in order to keep "those blacks" out, and regain their lost ground of holy white paradise and white only water fountains. The discrimination would be endless and imaginative and of course destructive and poisonous that would no doubt shred society apart.

Is UKIP homophobic? I think so. It is indeed a new breed of libertarianism that is rabidly unmasking itself and showing its ugly face for all to see... That's if you care to see it. They can write whatever they like in their manifesto, but it is actions that speak louder. So far Farage has been harboring known homophobes. For the sake of "liberty," Farage is protecting people who want gays to have no liberty, and continues to support homophobes like Winston McKenzie, even defending his anti-gay views on the day of the recent by-election of Croydon North as Inside Croydon reports: "UKIP leader Nigel Farage today backed what he sees as McKenzie’s Christian stand on gay adoption and expressed concern about the treatment of Catholic adoption agencies opposed to gay adoption."

Note that he expresses concern for the Church and not the already damaged image of the party (or the rights of gays for that matter) - so why should we? Lets just call it for what it is, and say that UKIP harbors and protects homophobes. That is clear as day. And that doesn't make it a party of principles, but a party lacking any cohesion at all. If this is how they operate the party, imaging how they might operate a government office.

McKenzie proudly stated that gays should not be allowed to adopt because it is "unhealthy," and this comes after UKIP tried to sway public sympathy after a UKIP couple who were denied foster kids by the local authorities fearing the couple could discriminate against these immigrant children. If the public actually knew what libertarians in UKIP actually stand for we would all agree that the decision to keep immigrant children away from people who manifest anti-social views and who quite frankly, view government child services as form a of evil, was actually the correct move. Libertarians do not believe in public social services, so what is this couple crying about? It would be the same if a Libertarian would be crying after being denied unemployment benefits or food stamps. It would just be too darn hilarious.

There is no doubt in my mind that the Libertarian movement, and UKIP leading the way now, is by its very nature a dysfunctional nightmare. The last day I was a member of the party, it took the chairman over half an hour to start a steering committee meeting due to some libertarian members who were questioning the authority of the chairman, and then the authority of the committee itself as members running the meeting were being called "authoritarians" for daring to use the gable and call the meeting to order. It has become that dysfunctional.

The next day I changed my party affiliation to independent. And I never looked back since.

Americans Vote AGAINST NOM, Vatican

 

Last night was not pretty for the anti-gay organization. Voters in Maine, Maryland, and Washington approved and affirmed same sex marriage rights, and Minnesota voters rejected a gay marriage ban. National Organization for Marriage's operatives touted their 32-0 record against gay marriage and WITH THAT they will prevail and deny marriage to gay couples, or so they thought.

But they clearly are not reading the clear writing on the wall and noticing that American voters are no longer interested in their archaic arguments of division (gays vs. blacks for example), hatred, and most importantly, lies.

NOM and company continued throughout the campaign lying to the voters that gay marriage will be forced on children and that religious organizations will have to stop offering adoption services. Besides the lies, these operatives even went to great extremes that undoubtedly had in effect turned people off, from saying gays are "worthy of death" to "gays are too promiscuous to get married" among the huge pile of anti-gay extremist Santorum froth they were spewing. 

The Vatican also had vested financial interest in making sure these initiatives do not pass. They now really need to do some soul searching, and literally find Jesus, and stop making gays their enemies.

NOM's influence is clearly shrinking, and for those (few) that actually invested money with NOM to stop gay marriage it is time to ask: why? It is time to consider NOM's relevance to you personally, to your political party, to your state, to your church, and to your country.

Of course, they will not listen. I predict that NOM will no doubt be relegated to one of many small, irrelevant, regional anti-gay groups like GodHatesFags.com and Porno Pete's 'Americans For Truth About Homosexuality' - don't recall these groups? Well, good. That's where these anti-gay groups, like NOM, belong: in the dustbin of forgotten history.

Really Stupid Anti-Gay Marriage Ad

After calling gay marriage 'sodomy based marriage' knowing that many heterosexual married couples actually do enjoy the abomination itself (oral and anal sex) here we have another abomination brought to you by the goofs over at "Protect Marriage Maine":

A high school guidance counselor whose job was targeted after he spoke out against same-sex marriage is featured in a television campaign by gay marriage opponents that launches Monday.

One of the two ads by Protect Marriage Maine features Donald Mendell of Palmyra, who was subject of a complaint with the Maine Department of Professional and Financial Regulation after appearing on TV during a 2009 referendum in which the state’s gay marriage law was repealed.

The obvious comes to mind: what does this have to do with gay marriage at all? And, Really... Maine REJECTED gay marriage in 2009 you dumb fucks. So this really retarded claim that gay marriage has lead to persecution of inbreds opposed to gay marriage is not going to cut it when the state has not legalized gay marriage yet.

If anybody is seriously considering this dumb shit as real I have some volcano insurance I would like to sell you.

Social Conservative Stupidity 101: We Cost American Jobs

Downright stupid and illogical social conservatives always seem to brighten my day as I laugh at their sheer gullible stupidity.

Here we have one of their leaders, knuckle-head Linda Harvey, saying that gays have cost jobs:

The National Organization for Marriage just released a very interesting report about the companies that support homosexuality as marriage; they are paying a price, literally, and of course, when a company doesn’t do well that means jobs in America are lost. Here are the specifics: the marriage group quoted an article in Forbes which tried to soften the reality of their findings but the truth is companies that support same-sex marriage lose positive band perception among both Democrats and Republicans. This reputation-loss is more pronounced among Republicans but the consumer distaste goes across party lines. The brands that were studied included Amazon.com, American Apparel, Apple, General Mills Brands, Google, Home Depot, JC Penney, Levi’s, Macy’s, Microsoft, Nabisco, Nike and Starbucks. I don’t know about you but in our house of those mentioned above we no longer patronize Macy’s, Home Depot or JC Penney, we no longer order from Amazon and we no longer buy any General Mills cereals. Some of these companies may be seeing a downturn in sales, when that continues it can lead to layoffs and lost jobs.

Basically the hag is unknowingly admitting that since these companies have endorsed gay marriage and have pro-gay policies, social conservatives are so anti-gay and homophobic that they will refuse to do business with these companies.

If this is true (which I highly doubt, being that corporate brands are falling in popularity across the board and in particular oil companies), then that means these childish anti-gay reactionaries like Linda have no one else to blame but themselves for the apperant losses at these companies and the joblessness that has been created being that THEY are the ones who are promoting the death of these companies to suit their homophobic rhetoric.

Stupidity at its best.

DRUDGE, Reactionaries Totally Making 'God' a Big Deal Distraction

The right wing fanatics and reactionaries at Drudge are having a field day with the DNC's supposed removal of the word 'God' from their platform.

 

Drudge is trying to distract us from the most important facts about the DNC with this really stupid headline. It is stupid in several ways as it is these same reactionaries that say that platforms 'don't matter,' - this is true when the GOP has called gays a threat to the country in their own platforms. Their response (and the many gay reactionaries and right wing fanatics) is that although such language is 'bad' in the end these platforms mean shit and are not worth the paper they are printed on, so not to worry Betty!

I'm not a fan of the democrats, but neither am I fan of fanatical bullshit to stir the pot. Drudge, as in many times, is trying to read the news for you, instead of us the readers deciding if in fact people were 'booing' at putting God back in the platform at the Democratic Convention. 

Watch the video:

As you can see, the delegates that we see are mainly pro-Arab/pro-Palestinian who are mainly of the Muslim variety and who do believe in God. What any moron can see from the video and with the basic understanding of geopolitics, is that these delegates were having a fit over the inclusion of Jerusalem not God. If you are a right wing moron fanatic, you are failing to see that many people in the middle east and around the world do not want to recognize Jerusalem as the Israeli capitol for whatever reasons I really don't give a shit about.

The reactionaries have an Anti-American agenda and a sick fetish to support Israel at all cost, even if it destroys our country politically or financially. Their fanaticism over Israel is getting nauseating and I think we as Americans have had enough of this bullshit. We don't care about Israel. We need to get back to work and not be having these childish antics like fifth graders arguing over what is the capitol of which country. It is basically pointless at this juncture.

As far as God is concerned, well... What do I know? Nothing. God is something we humans are not able to understand, but maybe one day we will, however that time isn't now, and of course, it isn't here at DNC 2012. Come on. Whether or not God is in the Democratic platform is like arguing what shade our bible covers should be. God doesn't need vindication on platforms that both liberals and reactionaries agree are meaningless.

Oh remember this little tidbit?



And remember how the reactionaries (both gay and straight) were trying to explain away their own people booing at a gay soldier? "No, it wasn't at the gay soldier, it was at the question..." yada yada...

Gay Orgs Were Wrong in Issuing Statements Re: FRC Shooting

By doing so, gay organizations are furthering the reactionary theory that gays were behind this event, clearly we are not.

Shall we disavow violence? Duh, any normal human being would. Saying we are against violence of any kind means that somehow were FOR violence sometime in the past - and of course, this is not the case. It means that we let down our guard and somehow were condoning acts of violence against innocent people.

I don't get why gay orgs are having a guilt trip over this event. The shooter did not receive his marching orders from us. Nobody from the gay DC center made him do it. Nobody from the community coerced him to do it. We all know that such acts will make all us look bad in front of the public. And the only people to benefit from this event are the Family Research Council and their supporters - including the right wing reactionary base.

We don't owe anybody any statement on an incident that is still not quite clear on what exactly happened or what motivated the shooter (I have my own theories on this as well). And since the Family Research Council has never issued any statements when gay people actually get killed, murdered, tortured, raped, harassed, shot at, etc. every time it happens, why should our supposed gay leaders and representatives say anything at all?

All the gay orgs are doing is adding to the right wing reactionaries' story lines of how bad we gay people are and how murderous and dangerous we can be. Remember, Family Research Council makes its money from spouting such convoluted accusations against the gay community all the time.

No apologies. We didn't do ANYTHING wrong. Period.

Standing up for our economic rights, equal civil liberties, equal treatment, freedom of expression and association should not equate gun shot wound to the arm, and we cannot let the reactionaries hijack the discussion towards that direction.

Family Research Council shooting to be used to demonize gays

There are many reasons why I find it hard to believe that Floyd Corkins II acted out of his own hatred for the anti-gay hate group. Until I receive really good evidence that Corkins acted out of his own volition I am holding out in saying that this event was authentic and/or "domestic terrorism."

Here are some few thoughts:

• Immediately conservatives have labeled this as "domestic terrorism" yet cannot point to any specific evidence of this being the case. The FBI has stated that no motive has been dealt with yet. And the motive will be important because conservatives are ready and willing to blame this event on gay people no matter what.
• My own private investigator has done some research and determined that the shooter has no criminal record and has volunteered at the DC gay center. If the event was staged as it could have been, then choosing a gay man to do the shooting can help make the screenplay more believable. The PI has also done a psychological profile on the shooter upon my request, and he determined that this 'acting out' is totally out of character. The investigator is trained in forensics and criminal psychological profiling, who has trained thousands of police officers across the nation. After hanging up the phone on him I am beginning to believe that maybe, just maybe he did not act alone.
• The whole Chick-Fil-A bag is also something that really stands out to me. Was this shooter pulling off a 'political stunt?' But the bag does take away whatever seriousness of 'domestic terrorism' the MSM is trying to portray. It just looks Mickey Mousey to me. Just like when the Colorado lesbians who also faked and staged their own 'domestic terrorism' against their property over a beef they had with the homeowner's association by labeling their garage door with anti-gay vandalism, missing some very expensive areas of the house which a REAL vandal would have struck. You see, if a lesbian couple in Colorado with no resources can be able to pull off a fake hate crime incident, so too can an organization like the Family Research Council who has a huge war chest, government connections, and political ties to Washington lawmakers. Plus, the Chick-Fil-A factor may be used to up the sales at the anti-gay chicken joint and try to raise its already dwindling popularity. In the end, these types of incidents there are always going to be winners, and in this case is the Family Research Council and Chick-Fil-A. To be honest, I wouldn't be surprised if Chick-Fil-A was the one behind the shooting itself by coercing the shooter (just like previous shooters) to carry out the event, carrying one of their bags to make it look like the shooter was acting out of hatred for Chick-Fil-A's anti-gay values. 
• Then you have Fox Nation saying that 'CONSERVATIVES' were being fired at, when clearly that was not the case, it was an ARMED guard that got shot in the arm and whose political affiliations are not known to us.
• The media hype is also quite laughable. Where is this hype when a gay center gets vandalized? Nowhere. Being that most of the hype comes from the right I would have to say that conservatives are interested in using this event for political gain than finding out what truly happened. So I guess now we must claim that every act against gay people must considered 'domestic terrorism' and we must therefore blame conservatives as well. Okay, fine.
• Lets not forget that it was just yesterday that a conservative minister was found guilty of aiding in international kidnapping of a lesbian's daughter. The shooting has totally dominated that bit of news today. Coincidence? Being that Liberty University has their finger prints all over this kidnapping and have financial ties to Family Research Council.
• It is possible that this maniac that shot the guard may or MAY NOT BE GAY. If he was passing off as an intern at the FRC lobby he could as well try to pass off as being gay at the DC center for a while. If he is crazy enough to try to shoot people at the heavily guarded FRC headquarters, he is crazy enough to build this persona. The investigator could not confirm for how long he volunteered at the center, but he said that if such info is not available then probably he was not there for a good length of time. 
• And lastly, why I think FRC (as opposed to Chick-Fil-A) could be behind this shooting and calling it 'domestic terrorism' is because its leader, Tony Perkins, used to be a government intel officer working in ... guess? Anti-terrorism and tactics. 

Again I am only speculating on things that are possible, but most likely probable based on known facts at this time. People in history had to go to very high extremes to win public opinion or debate, including engaging in false flag attacks.

If it turns out that this event was 'legit' then we have a another problem in our hands, but I wouldn't worry about it until we have SUFFICIENT evidence proving such. For now, my natural instincts tell me that there's something fishy behind this event. People should not just buy what the MSM says, but immerse themselves in the facts, leaving all possible conclusions open. 

Gay Republicans Support Paul Ryan Because of ONE Vote

The right wing reactionary Paul Ryan was selected as Mittens' Veep and the The Log Cabin Republicans are delighted, even though Paul Ryan wants to deny economic and fourth amendment rights to gay couples in the constitution, ban gays from adopting or raising their own children, and supported discrimination against gay soldiers. Yet somewhere in there the Log Cabin has found a reason to support Ryan. One single lonely reason: Ryan voted for ENDA.

Two points:

1) Paul Ryan will most certainly do a 180 on ENDA in order satisfy the right wing reactionary base who is most definitely opposed to such legislation and secure his 'solid conservative' image. Anybody voting for any pro-gay legislation is labeled as somebody who does not embody that image. We will see some form of flip-flopping or redaction. Mind you that Ryan will be speaking at the ultra-anti-gay convention 'Values Voters Summit' - a gathering of hardcore fascists and reactionaries who believe the government has the right to throw gays in jail. Yes, its that hardcore.

2) Here Log Cabin is being hypocritical and nonsensical. If you are willing to support a candidate because he only did one thing you support, you might as well support Obama who is still engaging in Bush-era policy of water boarding and war mongering. If you can find just one agreeable thing in common with Obama, then why not support his ass as well?

Pointing out Ryan's one lonely pro-gay action was, I think, a bad reason or justification for Log Cabin to endorse him, and a really stupid one at best. They should have just endorsed him by saying that he is the best right wing reactionary on the ticket and we like him because he hates the American system that we have and we agree with him that we should gut that system, regardless how many lives we lose in doing it.

Just be honest and say that Loggers. Jeez.

Jose Soto Show: Gay Men On Grindr, Closeted Homos, Sikh Temple Shooting Update, Biblical Marriage

Today on the show we talk about gay men on Grindr and how that is affecting gay social skills and real human interactions. Has the gay community turned even more superficial? Is Grindr just an expression of the gay male community's weakness of being too promiscuous. Or can we actually use Grindr for a better use?

Larry Craig is back in the news as he is being sued by the government for using his campaign money for his defense in the men's bathroom fiasco in which he was arrested in a sex sting. He still continues to deny that he is gay and was looking for sex at the time and now says that he was on 'Official Senate business' ... No kidding. What drives these fools to behave such a way? Is it a fetish?

A neo-Nazi fanatic invades a Sikh temple and shoots down six people before being killed by the cops. It later turns out that the shooter had been tracked by the FBI and Southern Poverty Law Center and failed to stop him.

What is 'Biblical Marriage?' It is a term used by those Christians who oppose gay marriage, yet in the bible god happens to approve of polygamy, rape and slave marriages, and of course, NOM had the audacity to defend this 'definition' ... Way to go!

Why is there an increase of sever gay bashing around the country? It seems that anti-gays are getting more profane, violent, and deadly. Be warned: we will see more if not more deadly and sever attacks by fanatics.

Jose Soto Show: Mars Rover, Chick-Fil-A Kiss-in Fail, Free Speech

Today on the show we talk about the new Mars rover 'Curiosity' that has landed tonight. Why don't we actually spend the money on finding out what these structures are and if they are artificially made or not.

The face on Mars next to pyramid structures.

Face close up.

More pyramid structures from Mars (Right) compared with pyramid structures on Earth (Left).

Glass tunnel subway type structures on Mars.

Here's the first picture from the just landed Curiosity Mars rover:

This just looks like a bunch of nerds with cushy high paying jobs playing around with an expensive toy on Mars while refusing to answer the pivotal question of whether or not intelligent life ever existed or still exists on Mars. 

Meanwhile, this whole free speech debate over Chick-Fil-A is just a cover for the right wing's hypocritical attempt to make anti-gay comments and behavior justifiable. It is funny that many conservatives are ready to ban children's books because it has 'two mommies' from libraries while foaming at the mouth in defending Dan Cathy's anti-gay free speech.

We've also seen conservatives foaming at the mouth against comics who 'go too far.' It seems like conservatives are not really for free speech unless such speech degrades gay people in some form or another.

And what happened to the gay kiss-in protest against Chick-Fil-A. It appears not that many gays showed up to pucker up and give one to Dan Cathy. In a way its fine, because in the end what was the point of this kiss-in anyway?

Angry Email From Chick-Fil-A Supporter

Got this in my inbox this morning:

Youre nothing but a pathetic faggot son of bitch. Chick fil a has done nothing wrong but expose you demonic filthy lifestyle. I hope you die of fuckin aids you fucking cocksucker. you fucking piece of shit sodomite. DIE OF FUCKING AIDS!

Well I'm not going to die of AIDS because I do not have HIV and my sexual activity has been reduced to a minimum lately. I do take care of myself, wear protection, and eat healthy.

This fucknut is encouraging people to eat at a fast food restaurant that for sure can give you heart disease and diabetes. I'm not dying of AIDS you delusional prick, but YOU are dying of cholesterol and possibly cardiac arrest. All to make a point at us homos. YOU want to ruin your body with fat toxins to make us feel bad? Really? Run that by me again dufus.

But please go ahead. Stuff your fat face with this shit. Let's see who will be begging for Lipitor from the medicaid program (wait a minute! life saving medication is socialized healthcare! I forgot).

Right wing fanatics, I tell ya.

Jose Soto Show: Eat at Chick-Fil-A Day!, Pastor Blames Pedophilia on Gays

Today's topics: today is 'Eat at Chick-Fil-A' Day, gay employees at Chick-Fil-A come out, a pastor says that gays molest kids, and we take a look at a recent interview where Barney Frank and Chris Matthews duke it out.

Pic of the day: Typical Fat Ass Moron Who Supports Chick-Fil-A

Alright, I take it back - some of them may not be as ugly as Mike, but eh, its close enough.

Happy National Eat at Chick-Fil-A day fat asses! Hope you enjoy stuffing your fat faces for the cause.

Irony: Isn't Mike a huge proponent of weight loss and healthy eating? Remember when he used to be a giant fat ass?

Oops!

Cousin of mine assassinated by drug cartels in Mexico

The wages of the drug war have finally taken a toll on my family. A cousin of mine has been found dead and according to some of my relatives his body was dismembered. When will our governments get it? This war only leads to more death and destruction. What we need is to lift the living standards of Mexico and to discourage people from doing stupid things.

As to the exact reasons why he was killed that still remain unclear, but most likely he owed people some money or he doubled cross the bosses.

Report: (google translated)

With regard to the incidents that occurred on Wednesday 25 July this year when they located the bodies of four men with signs of violence and gun shots, in the municipality of Santiago Papasquiaro, Durango, in an area adjacent to Francisco Javier Leyva village finally on Thursday, three were identified.
The first of the deceased was identified by relatives with the name of Nicholas Aragon Nevarez 53 years of age, residing in the street Benito Juarez, Nuevo Ideal Durango, who was last seen alive on 23 July of this.
The second case corresponds to the identification of the body of Cesar Rene Soto Aguirre 24 years of age, resident of Magdalena Avenue in Nuevo Ideal Durango., Being last seen on Sunday July 22.
The third deceased was fully identified with the name of Rafael Hernández Ruiz 47 years of age, residing in the Emiliano Zapata Street, in the municipal capital of Nuevo Ideal, Durango.
According to autopsy studies performed in those deceased, it was confirmed that the cause of their deaths is consecutive impact of projectile fired from a firearm penetrating skull in four cases.

Oh well, what a shame.

No, Chick-Fil-A is not the 'biblical based' company it proclaims to be

In fact I reached out to one of my good friends who is a traveling baptist minister. He is not your typical bible thumper by all means but he does take the bible seriously and has made several life changes to adhere to his version of Scripture.

I emailed him about this whole Chick-Fil-A broo-ha-ha and to see what he thinks about the company. I had several questions, mostly asking if in fact the company is truly a 'Christian' company managed under 'biblical principals.'

Jose-
I want to be very honest with you because in Christ, honesty makes way for love, and we must trust his word in the Holy Gospels, and nothing else can be further from the truth than to foolishly believe that this company is actually observing the teachings of our Lord Christ. 

[...]

When a company makes outlandish claims in order to make billions in profits, a true Christian must be very skeptical, just as our Lord was skeptical of the outlandish claims that were made by the Priesthood of his day. The President of the company was the true arrogant and prideful one. He knows that many people of certain political persuasion would no doubt support his Company. I don't think he is guilty as charged for being hateful, but he is being guilty of pride and arrogance as he looks down at those who are different from him and who have less than he does. As I always say, Jose, a true Christian is a "follower" of Christ who is blessed with the gift of humbleness, unlike Mr. Cathy. 

[...] 

Just because you close on Sundays and oppose same-sex marriage doesn't make you a Christian company. Neither does going to church on Sundays and donating to your local charity. You have to live in Christ and treat your fellow brothers in Christ with love and joy. But that is not we personally experience at Chick-Fil-A. It was two years ago we stopped by a Chick-Fil-A in Florida after ministering a few hours with a group of college students at an event of a local Student Fellowship. We were there to rest a bit as it was a hot day. We planned on to order something later on for dinner so we just took out our bibles and reviewed all the wonderful spiritual nutrition that our Lord blessed us that day with. After a twenty minutes or so a staff member told us to basically "buy something or get out." One of our brothers then got up and starting leaving. I tried to explain that were just resting and that we were planning to have dinner later on. The staff member didn't want to hear it. The restaurant was filled and they wanted us out. Before leaving one of the other Brothers, our driver, wanted to drink some water but was denied. We went to an Italian restaurant a few miles away and had a wonderful time and dinner. And the couple who owned the restaurant were very pleasant and let us have a short bible study before dinner. They gave us water and bread.  

Jose, its pretty clear to me that a company this inhospitable to their brothers has no business calling themselves Christian. And they bring shame to this child of God and follower of Christ.
God Bless You Brother,

And we all know why Sodom was destroyed by God right? Unlike some stupid airheads who repeat like parrots what their pastors say, Sodom was not destroyed because of homosexuality (it is really hard to believe that an entire city is homosexual), but because of lack of hospitality and being unkind. Now, were Dan Cathy's words kind and hospitable? I think not. Those 'Christians' who cry foul and defend Dan Cathy and Chick-Fil-A should just stop and for once really read and understand what Dan said not just focus on whether or not he has a right to say it or not.

I just cannot believe the horseshit that comes out of NOM

For instance, they are demanding that companies and corporations 'remain neutral' on the gay marriage debate. Fine, but we have a problem here.

The National Organization for Marriage has now supported Chick-Fil-A not for remaining neutral, but for outright opposing gay marriage, because maybe, just maybe, the National Organization for Marriage doesn't like gay marriage (you think?). And for an organization who has already decided on which side they stand on a subject to demand neutrality of others really defeats the purpose of even forming such an organization that is trying to convince everybody to take their side. This ploy is nothing but sinister mind games, and believe me - I seen better and more sophisticated mind games played by crack addicts and shoplifters.

But then we have Target Inc., who just said that they are clearly 'neutral' on gay marriage in their home state of Minnesota. This neutrality stance is their official policy.

So I just thought that since NOM demands companies and corporations remain 'neutral' on gay marriage politicking then why don't they say thanks and congratulate the only company that has come out with an official 'neutrality' stance on gay marriage. NOM should consider having a national "shop at Target day" ... or is that going to make them uncomfortable being that Target sales gay merchandise and has a gay wedding registry for gay couples?

What NOM demands is NOT neutrality, but total rejection of gays because in this case political abstinence is not enough. To NOM, companies must engage in attacking the economic and social rights of gay people, hence why nobody in their right minds should believe that NOM is only about marriage or anything like that - its just filled with horseshit.

 

Jose Soto Show: Chick Fil A Recap, Alex Jones' Anti-Gay Rant, Gay Death Penalty

Jose again explains what the Chick-Fil-A scandal is all about, takes on Alex Jones' latest anti-gay rant over the Olympic openning ceremonies, and a pastor misses the time when gays were put to death.

Jose Soto Show: Tripp Palin, Ex-Gay Porn Therapy, Gay Marriage and Big Bucks

Today's show topics: Tripp Palin did drop the 'f' bomb we all thought, the Muppets dump Chick-Fil-A, using gay porn to turn you straight, gay marriage gives big money to NYC, and an update on the suspect involved in the Colorado shooting.

Jose Soto Show: Gun Control vs Gay Rights

Today's topics: Gun control debate shooting down gay rights, homophibic drudge readers, an uppity transgender, it gets better fallacay, First American female lesbian austronaut in space dies of cancer, and other topics

Jose Soto Show: NOM Declares 'National Eat At Chick-Fil-A Day'

From yesterday's show. I discuss NOM's decision to celebrate a company who is opposed to gay marriage as a demand for companies to remain 'neutral' on gay marriage.

Jose Soto Show: Creepy Facts About The Batman Movie Shooting

On yesterday's show I review the creepy strange facts about the Batman movie shooting.

NOM Demands 'Corporate Neutrality' on Gay Marriage by Having 'National Eat at Chick-Fil-A Day'

Wrap your head around this one if you can.

The Bilderger/Vatican financially backed National Organization 'For' Marriage is demanding that corporations remain 'neutral' on gay marriage, yet as expected they break their own rules and logic (which is what they do on a daily basis) by coming up with 'National Eat at Chick-Fil-A' Day and demanding all who hate gay marriage to chow down on frozen-processed delights at the fast food chain restaurant. Yum!

I don't know about you, but I hate fast food on par with homophobes, so this day for me (which will be on the 25th, mark your calendars!) will be a day of infamy IF they can actually pull it of. Which I doubt. But who knows? Maybe on that day Chick-Fil-A sales may tick up a little since more people eat junk fast food on Wednesdays during lunch (which Chick-Fil-A thrives on) than on other days, this is based on stats I got to read when I was a manager of a restaurant (who competed with a fast food giant next door to us). And of course, if these numbers remain the same, NOM will claim victory on something they have nothing to do with. Mark my words. Gay bloggers go ahead and bookmark this post and know that this is their M.O. and it is bound to happen. Jose Soto has warned you all. Of course this shouldn't be a surprise to many of us. NOM will lie, cheat and steal to get what it wants, heck it has employed racist tactics before so anything is possible for this stupid muppet organization that is only run by seven people.

Some hack for NOM excused the special day as 'thanking the company for deciding to remain neutral.' But the thing is is that the company's head chief, Dan Cathy, is not neutral. Their donations to anti-gay marriage groups is by all means far from the definition of neutrality, especially if you take into consideration that some of these donations went to groups who want gays thrown in jail. Far from that. And besides an anti-gay marriage organization commanding all of its minions to swallow their chicken sandwiches and pay them money is not a sign a of neutrality either.

On another note, Charlie Brian Brown is touting that 'fat cats are behind gay marriage' yet here they are calling on all of their units to Chick-Fil-A and to give all their money to a very wealthy family, the Cathys, and a corporation that is worth billions. Then again, I take this latest tantrum with a grain of salt as NOM is financially supported by a hedge fund zombie and neo-con Wall Street artist Robert George who is a big supporter of the 'free market' (not the kind where you open a business, the kind where big wall street bankers loot all the money from the treasury - that kind of free market).

Some Weird, Creepy Facts About The Batman Shooting, Massacre

The nation is in shock after the massacre that was unleashed at a Colorado movie theater as a gunman shoots and kills 12 people injuring more than 70 during the midnight premier of the latest Batman movie 'Dark Night Rises.' While some brainless talking heads want to make guns, meds, movie violence, gay friendly churches, (and for anti-gay pinheads 'religious freedom' even though many people around the world massacre each other over religious beliefs) the issue and the focal point, there are few fascinating yet weird facts that intrigue me about this disaster.

I am just laying this out there for you to ponder, some of these points might catch your eye (as they did to me) or you may be free to ignore:

• The gunman was not dressed up as 'The Joker' as some news agencies report, but rather as 'Bane' the new Batman nemesis. 
• The gunman supposedly 'busted through' the exit only doors that only open outward. And now a witness has come forward saying that SOMEBODY let the gunman in.
• The gunman only lived within a mile from the theater.
• The gunman supposedly purchased firearms at a guns shop, now it appears that he got them through the mail.
• The theater is very close to Columbine High School, another infamous place where a mass shooting took place.
• And now the NYPD 'Commissioner' is somehow getting involved on this as well. Saying he will protect the people from 'The Joker' - sort of like actually playing the part of the Gotham City police Commissioner. This bit is strange if you look at it the day before the incident happen, seems like a scene from the Movie or Comic book.
• The gunman thinks he is in a movie.
• The gunman was a neuroscience student, who some believed worked on department of defense projects on the human brain (sort of like 'The Riddler' in 'Batman Forever').
• Many infamous shootings took place in or involved a theater: John Wilkes Booth kills Abraham Lincoln in a theater; after assassinating JFK Lee Harvey Oswald was found in a movie theater.
• Shooting imitates a scene in a 1986 Batman comic book. In it a gunman opens fire at people in a porn movie theater.
• Other tragedies: Heath Ledger dies during editing of the previous Batman movie, Morgan Freeman was involved in a car accident, and a set technician died on the set.
• This mural depicts a 'Bane' like character massacring children - the mural is at Denver airport.
  
• The following is a song 'Bad Days' by The Flaming Lips part of the 'Batman Forever' soundtrack. I find this song quite strange and eye opening since it was the theme song for 'The Riddler' who I think has more of a resemblance to the gunman (a washed up wannabe unemployed neuroscientist who invented a machine to read people's minds through the television). The lyrics are simple (and few): 'You have to sleep late when you can / And all your bad days will end' (Remember the shooting took place really late during a midnight screening), then these lyrics: 'you hate your boss at your job /  but in your dreams you can blow his head off / in your dreams show no mercy.' Listen:
  
• 'Dark Knight Rises' - how about 'Dark NIGHT Rises,' in mythology our ancestors always thought that once darkness fell (the dark night) bad and evil things usually happen.

UPDATE: Some more facts I forgot about:

• Bruce Wayne's parents were killed after exiting the movie theater.
• Here is another song (the main theme song) from the 'Batman Forever' soundtrack: 'Hold Me, Thrill Me, Kiss Me... Kill Me'. I'll let you figure this obvious one out.
  

Again, I am just laying these strange and creepy facts about this case. I think there is more to 'Batman' than what we know.

"Holy gay stars Batman!"

Porno Pete Screeds: 'SHE'S A LESBIAN'

Even though Mr Pete's (not to be confused with one of my favorite porn stars "Mr. Pete" as he is a nice guy) fascination and fetish mainly remains on gay men, in particular gay men's anuses. Today he decided to attack lesbians, and not just any lesbian, but one with a black robe. He's basically having a tantrum over the fact that the Illinois Judge who is presiding over the gay marriage case is a lesbian.

Porno Pete is not having any of it. He thinks gays shouldn't be on cases that involve gay rights (he also thinks gays shouldn't be judges, period, just thrown in jail with the rest of the "sexual deviants") because gays might be 'biased.' Oh really? In that case, we shouldn't have Mormon judges or Catholic ones because they are already biased against it anyway. But nobody is asking for Scalia to not preside over the pending DOMA cases since his religion mandates against same-sex marriages. But since ole' Pete can do it, why can't the rest of also demand these biased judges to be recused? Or how about straight judges too? They might be biased as well. I guess the only 'fit' judges who will show no 'biases' whatsoever are asexual agnostics.

Lets not go there because that is totally lame and a distraction from the real issue: are gays entitled to the same economic and free expression rights as everybody else? You figure this one out, if you need an answer from me than I doubt you have any concept of American and Human progress.

That is why Porno Pete is so disingenuous, he thinks that only gays are biased and his call to have the lesbian judge removed is not a call to strong judicial ethics but a continuance of homophobic lies on his supposed Americans 'For Truth' quack fruity website.

Happy Days Are Here Again: MLS Gives Boy Scouts the Boot

I am not a soccer fan, but I am a fan of kicking homophobic butt out of our normal lives. Main link today on The Gay Report: Major League Soccer Gives Boy Scouts The Boot. It is really gratifying writing those words.

In the beginning of the 2012 soccer season, MLS shacked it up with the homophobic and anti-gay organization (and a haven for boy rapists) The Boys Scouts of America in a partnership of sorts. The Gay Report first reported on it, and the League was sort of caught in a potential scandal, since the league has a strong record against LGBT discrimination. They told The Gay Report that they didn't have any comment, but later when I personally called them back and talked to a guy who worked as some program department director b.s. (I couldn't get anybody from PR) and told me that many people didn't know about the MLS's anti-gay policy at the time they formed the partnership. I said maybe I should write something on the site to remind the MLS of not only about the BSA's anti-gay bigotry but its even more dangerous scandal of hiding pedophiles in leadership positions.

By then the guy on the phone was sort of choking on his own spit. "Do your homework!" I said very clear on the phone, which I think did resonate and sunk in to this guy's head. Hey! This gay guy is not messing around!

He then told me that he would talk to MLS management personally to make sure that this was the last time the MLS was going to do anything with the Boy Scouts. With that I promised him I wouldn't write anything after that and TA-DA! Today we finally see that the MLS has finally come to their senses and drop this hideous organization and kicked them to the curb; though of course they are trying to soften this a bit by saying:

"Major League Soccer’s agreement with the Boy Scouts of America expires at the end of the 2012 season and MLS does not intend the renew the agreement for a variety of business reasons..."

A variety reasons? Yes how about a good reason (and a good business decision) is to not associate with fruity pedophiles and homophobes. Yes, that's it. Good decision, good call.

Were The Boy Scouts Blackmailed? I think so.

It is nothing new: No gays allowed in the boy scouts... boo-hoo.

But what is new is how they recycled an obvious old decision from 2010 in which they affirmed the anti-gay policy. They claim that they held a 'secret meeting' with unnamed individuals who secretly decided unanimously to keep the gay ban.

It wasn't that long ago that they decided to review the policy, but at the time of announcing such review they stated that they will not make a decision any time soon... well they have all of sudden decided and have given the finger once again to the gay community. But all of these esoteric sudden methods really had me wondering and it wasn't until I talked to a close associate of one of the board members of the BSA that this 'announcement' of sorts really caught everybody by surprise.

It looks to me that someone inside is pulling hard and on very thing strings to pull this off. And it is not far off to claim that the leadership of the BSA is most likely in deed compromised or even blackmailed. This to me makes great sense because the Boy Scouts are riddled with huge pedophilia problems (all of them caused by heterosexual men with an uncontrollable lust for tight boy booty and young prepubescent pink cock). It is not far fetched to believe someone knows something and may even be holding on to damaging evidence of suspected pedophilia cover-up by the leadership or maybe even the higher ups themselves putting their hands into the forbidden cookie jar. Who knows. But I will place my bet on that indeed someone in leadership is being blackmailed by somebody who doesn't want gays to come in for whatever reason.

For me, not joining the boy scouts is a good thing. Maybe when all the pedophilia is exposed, as it should be if we still live in a sane world, we will then be able to prove that openly gays are no danger to children but instead predatory heterosexuals in positions of power have been since the inception of the Boy Scouts. Gays should stay out and let the world see for themselves how the heterosexists can destroy something that is deemed to be good for the morale of children yet end up robbing them of their innocence.

Wait a minute! Since when did this Chick-Fil-A thing turned out to be about gay marriage?

In the beginning we were pointing out the fact that Chick-Fil-A was giving millions of dollars to anti-gay organizations. And not just any 'anti-gay organization.' But to organizations like the Family Research Council and Exodus international. FRC is an anti-gay extremist group that farts out stupid fanatical reactionary ideas like criminalizing homosexuality and putting gays in jail. I don't know about you, but that is as anti-gay as you can get. And so every time you go and buy their high calorie charged deep fried chicken sandwich, know that you are contributing to the subjugation of gay human beings as that money goes to these fascist reactionaries who have big dreams and aspirations to put every gay man and woman in prison camps.


So then somehow that all changed when Dan Cathy, the COO of the hideous Chick-Fil-A Inc that helps contribute to these anti-gay and anti-American projects, comes out and addresses marriage as the issue by claiming he is 'guilty as charged' for supporting these groups -- WHY? -- because of marriage.

So now the debate is about gay marriage and not about basic human rights and fighting fascist reactionary rhetoric of putting gays into concentration camps. By doing so, Cathy is now painting himself as the 'victim' of the 'homofascists' who hate marriage. With that in mind it will be a lot harder to convince people about the company's total and complete animus against gay people, not just gay marriage. You see, people for now find it acceptable to 'disagree' on gay marriage based on principle, especially one based on the all mighty bible, but what is not up for debate (at least in normal human discussion) is whether or not gay people should face criminal prosecution for being gay. That is just isn't acceptable, even for the most conservative politician and talking head.

Being that the debate and discussion has quickly changed over night, Chick-Fil-A is now quickly becoming a right wing conservative martyr for the cause of 'preserving marriage' (aka denying it to gay couples). We are no longer focused on the outright violation of human dignity this company made by giving such donations to groups who want gays all behind bars and face cruel punishments, but now it has turned into a debate that shouldn't have: does a company have a right to oppose gay marriage? This is no longer a discussion of freedom vs oppression but now about gay marriage proponents vs gay marriage opponents, and we all know what the tactics of the opponents are - diminish the credibility of gays and make us look like the bad guys when in fact all we want is the same economic rights that others have. But trying to get hardcore Chick-Fil-A fanatics to listen to us is becoming quite difficult now, most of these people seems to me can't even find their own state on the map let alone understand the complexities of human sexuality. To a lot of them Chick-Fil-A is just another good and honest 'Christian' company that 'supports marriage.' End of debate. And they will not care about the real issue here: Chick-Fil-A supports groups who want to persecute gays and throw them into a black hole and throw away the key. This portion is now silenced.

Dan Cathy is now doing his rounds, making himself look like he's just a nice guy with an honest 'opinion on marriage.'

Dufus shooting pro-gay marriage sign is not impressive

So here we have Senor Dufus from North Carolina USA shooting at a sign that is opposed to the proposed marriage amendment that would ban gay marriage and any other recognition of same sex-couples.

Does he really think that this is supposed to frighten me? At least intimidate me? Maybe even be impressive?

Hardly.

All he is doing is giving the public the impression that those oppose to gay marriage can only communicate through the use of bullets. This type of approach has landed humanity and its many societies in deep trouble. Instead of sorting things out, especially political things, through civil means like using our mouths to talk it out, people like this guy who result to using the sword rather than the word are people who are rather useless in any debate. We have witnessed in history that guns (swords) and politics don't mix, from assassinations of Julius Cesar to JFK, guns are meant to be used in defending yourself against aggression and not to be used as a political statement.

What he is trying to do, I think, is to get a reaction and to impress us with his masculine grab of his macho gun. Please. Just because I am gay doesn't mean I tremble into a pile of shameful jelly rocks any time I see a gun. Guns don't bother me. Its idiots that ruin what used to be fun things like shooting guns that really make me want to disown humanity.

I too own some guns, and in fact, Senor Pistolero, my gun is bigger than yours. I happen to own (legally) an M16 fully automatic, and yes I am trained to use it. For those gays who don't know what I am talking about, I own a rifle that shoots lots of bullets under a very short period of time:





I use my gun the way it was intended to be used: as a weapon of last resort, and not looking like an idiot shooting signs up to make a political point. I have a mind, I have a mouth, and I have fingers to type with to actually get my point across like a normal human being.

I could also make a video just like Senor Dufus and actually shot A LOT of signs (the anti-gay marriage ones of course) with my gun. But then what's the point? The best man knows not how to use his power but when.

As a law biding gun owner I will never stoop that low, and not even low enough to shoot signs of even the most bigoted campaigns. I know better than that.

Caphart is guilty of Grenell's Sin

People need to stop living in fantasyland and face the hardcore facts: Obama is against gay marriage. That is, up to the publication of this post, the official position of Barack Obama as clearly stated by his then running mate Joe Biden:




The Obama administration has already stated that his views have not changed, but rather "evolving." Note how they are picky in using the correct language. If the President were "changing" his views, that would be a more hopeful stance, but "evolving" means something else that is not change. And since Obama's campaign was all about "change" he nevertheless chose to use "evolving" rather than "changing."

Also, the Obama administration has in the past compared gay marriage to incest and pedophilia, Obama is still enforcing DOMA, and of course, who can forget the recent flop a week ago when Obama has refused to sign an ENDA executive order to stop government contractors from discriminating, which was a promise he made to gay democrats in 2008. However since it is Obama, he is something special. He is able to discriminate against gays and get away with it. Under Obama logic gays don't need executive protections, only blacks, the faithful, and the handicapped do. This is simple science to understand, and it is not that complicated to comprehend that gays have been duped by Obama.

One of those who lead the charge to further blind and quash the gay community's will, power and independence is Washington Post's Jonathan Capehart. He has become the rallying propaganda master for the White House against the gay community. He writes a screed that I think revealed more about him than it did on his intended target: Richard Grenell. Ironically titled "Richard Grenell Chose Power Over Principal on Marriage Equality," Capehart attacks Grenell, the newest gay employee for the Romney campaign, for allegedly, as the title suggests, that he has chosen to support Romney over supporting gay marriage:

"Grenell didn’t stand up to power. He opted for power itself for himself instead. Now we know why he is so eager to “out hypocrites.” He knows of what he speaks."

Pot meet kettle. If Capehart was at all serious about gay marriage, the man would have denounced Obama for the perpetual lie that he is a "fierce advocate," condemn the White House for their lack of support and refuse to endorse, protect or support Obama until he supports our cause. But he refuses to do so simply for political reasons and to overall help the president not us, and most importantly he should have refused to enter the White House as an invited guest. The reason why Capehart was invited and not you or I, is because Capehart is a good ole' boy who is told what to do and does what he is told. To the White House he is their gay speaker who is on the outside that can peddle the plans of the inside. It is a very good arrangement, I agree. This works quite well that Capehart has become somewhat predictable in his support of Obama and his anti-gay policies.

This pointless, rather childish article was a bit too personal for Capehart. He was caught red-handed by a gay Republican bot in his complete and naked hypocrisy. Yes, it is worth noting that Romney is supported by NOM, and that Romney supports amending the constitution to ban gay marriage. Obama is one step behind Romney in this issue, but as I pointed above, not even close to where the gay community stands.

In part both men have no right attack the other for they each support power over gay marriage. Capehart is a heartless lemon who supports Obama no matter what, and the same thing with Grenell, he supports Romney no matter what. It is called partisan shilling. It is bold, yet soulless.

What gives them authority to speak on this issue is beyond me. And to claim that either of these is better than the other for the candidate that they support is merely participating in a fraternity pissing contest.

If Capehart is whining that he didn't get his pissing trophy, then let him have it for goodness sake. Soon Obama, as expected, will ring the bell of liberty for gay marriage AFTER the election, because supporting gay marriage right now is too risky - that is the excuse we are being told by DNC White House operatives like Capehart. That might be true, in effect it gives credence to the idea that Obama is purely political and without principal, basically relegated to a man who seeks power over the needs of a vulnerable community like ours.

Caphart's tantrum is quite sad to be honest as he has no clue what he is talking about since he's mesmerized by the thought that he is attending one of the most famous dinners with one of the most famous Presidents in one of the most famous places. That alone can cause havoc to some people's logical mind and ooze gaga for the world's most powerful man in the free world. He is blinded by the honor that was bestowed on him. He is in a trance.

Meanwhile the rest of us who live in reality have a lot of work to do to get gay marriage legalized throughout our Republic. We don't need White House galas or political pandering to the real D.C. prostitutes. Capehart is angry that a gay GOP bot made a good valid point. Of course I don't support Grennell or even Romney, both men have shown nothing but contempt for our Republic and its well-being. But that doesn't mean that Obama and his political pimp are free from gay public scrutiny. Maybe that is why Capehart was angry enough to write an article about it. Like most political hacks he wants his actions to be vindicated, approved and free from criticism, something only reserved to the once rulers and nobles of the old world.

Cesar's guard has come out to punish those who dare question his authority. Now that's power.