Gay Orgs Were Wrong in Issuing Statements Re: FRC Shooting

By doing so, gay organizations are furthering the reactionary theory that gays were behind this event, clearly we are not.

Shall we disavow violence? Duh, any normal human being would. Saying we are against violence of any kind means that somehow were FOR violence sometime in the past - and of course, this is not the case. It means that we let down our guard and somehow were condoning acts of violence against innocent people.

I don't get why gay orgs are having a guilt trip over this event. The shooter did not receive his marching orders from us. Nobody from the gay DC center made him do it. Nobody from the community coerced him to do it. We all know that such acts will make all us look bad in front of the public. And the only people to benefit from this event are the Family Research Council and their supporters - including the right wing reactionary base.

We don't owe anybody any statement on an incident that is still not quite clear on what exactly happened or what motivated the shooter (I have my own theories on this as well). And since the Family Research Council has never issued any statements when gay people actually get killed, murdered, tortured, raped, harassed, shot at, etc. every time it happens, why should our supposed gay leaders and representatives say anything at all?

All the gay orgs are doing is adding to the right wing reactionaries' story lines of how bad we gay people are and how murderous and dangerous we can be. Remember, Family Research Council makes its money from spouting such convoluted accusations against the gay community all the time.

No apologies. We didn't do ANYTHING wrong. Period.

Standing up for our economic rights, equal civil liberties, equal treatment, freedom of expression and association should not equate gun shot wound to the arm, and we cannot let the reactionaries hijack the discussion towards that direction.

Family Research Council shooting to be used to demonize gays

There are many reasons why I find it hard to believe that Floyd Corkins II acted out of his own hatred for the anti-gay hate group. Until I receive really good evidence that Corkins acted out of his own volition I am holding out in saying that this event was authentic and/or "domestic terrorism."

Here are some few thoughts:

• Immediately conservatives have labeled this as "domestic terrorism" yet cannot point to any specific evidence of this being the case. The FBI has stated that no motive has been dealt with yet. And the motive will be important because conservatives are ready and willing to blame this event on gay people no matter what.
• My own private investigator has done some research and determined that the shooter has no criminal record and has volunteered at the DC gay center. If the event was staged as it could have been, then choosing a gay man to do the shooting can help make the screenplay more believable. The PI has also done a psychological profile on the shooter upon my request, and he determined that this 'acting out' is totally out of character. The investigator is trained in forensics and criminal psychological profiling, who has trained thousands of police officers across the nation. After hanging up the phone on him I am beginning to believe that maybe, just maybe he did not act alone.
• The whole Chick-Fil-A bag is also something that really stands out to me. Was this shooter pulling off a 'political stunt?' But the bag does take away whatever seriousness of 'domestic terrorism' the MSM is trying to portray. It just looks Mickey Mousey to me. Just like when the Colorado lesbians who also faked and staged their own 'domestic terrorism' against their property over a beef they had with the homeowner's association by labeling their garage door with anti-gay vandalism, missing some very expensive areas of the house which a REAL vandal would have struck. You see, if a lesbian couple in Colorado with no resources can be able to pull off a fake hate crime incident, so too can an organization like the Family Research Council who has a huge war chest, government connections, and political ties to Washington lawmakers. Plus, the Chick-Fil-A factor may be used to up the sales at the anti-gay chicken joint and try to raise its already dwindling popularity. In the end, these types of incidents there are always going to be winners, and in this case is the Family Research Council and Chick-Fil-A. To be honest, I wouldn't be surprised if Chick-Fil-A was the one behind the shooting itself by coercing the shooter (just like previous shooters) to carry out the event, carrying one of their bags to make it look like the shooter was acting out of hatred for Chick-Fil-A's anti-gay values. 
• Then you have Fox Nation saying that 'CONSERVATIVES' were being fired at, when clearly that was not the case, it was an ARMED guard that got shot in the arm and whose political affiliations are not known to us.
• The media hype is also quite laughable. Where is this hype when a gay center gets vandalized? Nowhere. Being that most of the hype comes from the right I would have to say that conservatives are interested in using this event for political gain than finding out what truly happened. So I guess now we must claim that every act against gay people must considered 'domestic terrorism' and we must therefore blame conservatives as well. Okay, fine.
• Lets not forget that it was just yesterday that a conservative minister was found guilty of aiding in international kidnapping of a lesbian's daughter. The shooting has totally dominated that bit of news today. Coincidence? Being that Liberty University has their finger prints all over this kidnapping and have financial ties to Family Research Council.
• It is possible that this maniac that shot the guard may or MAY NOT BE GAY. If he was passing off as an intern at the FRC lobby he could as well try to pass off as being gay at the DC center for a while. If he is crazy enough to try to shoot people at the heavily guarded FRC headquarters, he is crazy enough to build this persona. The investigator could not confirm for how long he volunteered at the center, but he said that if such info is not available then probably he was not there for a good length of time. 
• And lastly, why I think FRC (as opposed to Chick-Fil-A) could be behind this shooting and calling it 'domestic terrorism' is because its leader, Tony Perkins, used to be a government intel officer working in ... guess? Anti-terrorism and tactics. 

Again I am only speculating on things that are possible, but most likely probable based on known facts at this time. People in history had to go to very high extremes to win public opinion or debate, including engaging in false flag attacks.

If it turns out that this event was 'legit' then we have a another problem in our hands, but I wouldn't worry about it until we have SUFFICIENT evidence proving such. For now, my natural instincts tell me that there's something fishy behind this event. People should not just buy what the MSM says, but immerse themselves in the facts, leaving all possible conclusions open. 

Gay Republicans Support Paul Ryan Because of ONE Vote

The right wing reactionary Paul Ryan was selected as Mittens' Veep and the The Log Cabin Republicans are delighted, even though Paul Ryan wants to deny economic and fourth amendment rights to gay couples in the constitution, ban gays from adopting or raising their own children, and supported discrimination against gay soldiers. Yet somewhere in there the Log Cabin has found a reason to support Ryan. One single lonely reason: Ryan voted for ENDA.

Two points:

1) Paul Ryan will most certainly do a 180 on ENDA in order satisfy the right wing reactionary base who is most definitely opposed to such legislation and secure his 'solid conservative' image. Anybody voting for any pro-gay legislation is labeled as somebody who does not embody that image. We will see some form of flip-flopping or redaction. Mind you that Ryan will be speaking at the ultra-anti-gay convention 'Values Voters Summit' - a gathering of hardcore fascists and reactionaries who believe the government has the right to throw gays in jail. Yes, its that hardcore.

2) Here Log Cabin is being hypocritical and nonsensical. If you are willing to support a candidate because he only did one thing you support, you might as well support Obama who is still engaging in Bush-era policy of water boarding and war mongering. If you can find just one agreeable thing in common with Obama, then why not support his ass as well?

Pointing out Ryan's one lonely pro-gay action was, I think, a bad reason or justification for Log Cabin to endorse him, and a really stupid one at best. They should have just endorsed him by saying that he is the best right wing reactionary on the ticket and we like him because he hates the American system that we have and we agree with him that we should gut that system, regardless how many lives we lose in doing it.

Just be honest and say that Loggers. Jeez.

Jose Soto Show: Gay Men On Grindr, Closeted Homos, Sikh Temple Shooting Update, Biblical Marriage

Today on the show we talk about gay men on Grindr and how that is affecting gay social skills and real human interactions. Has the gay community turned even more superficial? Is Grindr just an expression of the gay male community's weakness of being too promiscuous. Or can we actually use Grindr for a better use?

Larry Craig is back in the news as he is being sued by the government for using his campaign money for his defense in the men's bathroom fiasco in which he was arrested in a sex sting. He still continues to deny that he is gay and was looking for sex at the time and now says that he was on 'Official Senate business' ... No kidding. What drives these fools to behave such a way? Is it a fetish?

A neo-Nazi fanatic invades a Sikh temple and shoots down six people before being killed by the cops. It later turns out that the shooter had been tracked by the FBI and Southern Poverty Law Center and failed to stop him.

What is 'Biblical Marriage?' It is a term used by those Christians who oppose gay marriage, yet in the bible god happens to approve of polygamy, rape and slave marriages, and of course, NOM had the audacity to defend this 'definition' ... Way to go!

Why is there an increase of sever gay bashing around the country? It seems that anti-gays are getting more profane, violent, and deadly. Be warned: we will see more if not more deadly and sever attacks by fanatics.

Jose Soto Show: Mars Rover, Chick-Fil-A Kiss-in Fail, Free Speech

Today on the show we talk about the new Mars rover 'Curiosity' that has landed tonight. Why don't we actually spend the money on finding out what these structures are and if they are artificially made or not.

The face on Mars next to pyramid structures.

Face close up.

More pyramid structures from Mars (Right) compared with pyramid structures on Earth (Left).

Glass tunnel subway type structures on Mars.

Here's the first picture from the just landed Curiosity Mars rover:

This just looks like a bunch of nerds with cushy high paying jobs playing around with an expensive toy on Mars while refusing to answer the pivotal question of whether or not intelligent life ever existed or still exists on Mars. 

Meanwhile, this whole free speech debate over Chick-Fil-A is just a cover for the right wing's hypocritical attempt to make anti-gay comments and behavior justifiable. It is funny that many conservatives are ready to ban children's books because it has 'two mommies' from libraries while foaming at the mouth in defending Dan Cathy's anti-gay free speech.

We've also seen conservatives foaming at the mouth against comics who 'go too far.' It seems like conservatives are not really for free speech unless such speech degrades gay people in some form or another.

And what happened to the gay kiss-in protest against Chick-Fil-A. It appears not that many gays showed up to pucker up and give one to Dan Cathy. In a way its fine, because in the end what was the point of this kiss-in anyway?

Angry Email From Chick-Fil-A Supporter

Got this in my inbox this morning:

Youre nothing but a pathetic faggot son of bitch. Chick fil a has done nothing wrong but expose you demonic filthy lifestyle. I hope you die of fuckin aids you fucking cocksucker. you fucking piece of shit sodomite. DIE OF FUCKING AIDS!

Well I'm not going to die of AIDS because I do not have HIV and my sexual activity has been reduced to a minimum lately. I do take care of myself, wear protection, and eat healthy.

This fucknut is encouraging people to eat at a fast food restaurant that for sure can give you heart disease and diabetes. I'm not dying of AIDS you delusional prick, but YOU are dying of cholesterol and possibly cardiac arrest. All to make a point at us homos. YOU want to ruin your body with fat toxins to make us feel bad? Really? Run that by me again dufus.

But please go ahead. Stuff your fat face with this shit. Let's see who will be begging for Lipitor from the medicaid program (wait a minute! life saving medication is socialized healthcare! I forgot).

Right wing fanatics, I tell ya.

Jose Soto Show: Eat at Chick-Fil-A Day!, Pastor Blames Pedophilia on Gays

Today's topics: today is 'Eat at Chick-Fil-A' Day, gay employees at Chick-Fil-A come out, a pastor says that gays molest kids, and we take a look at a recent interview where Barney Frank and Chris Matthews duke it out.

Pic of the day: Typical Fat Ass Moron Who Supports Chick-Fil-A

Alright, I take it back - some of them may not be as ugly as Mike, but eh, its close enough.

Happy National Eat at Chick-Fil-A day fat asses! Hope you enjoy stuffing your fat faces for the cause.

Irony: Isn't Mike a huge proponent of weight loss and healthy eating? Remember when he used to be a giant fat ass?

Oops!