Cato's Prop 8 SCOTUS Brief Matters More Than Obama's

Gay Inc. is going gaga after Obama (well actually a lawyer at the Justice Department, but nonetheless O was in control of the situation) filed a brief against proposition 8 at the Supreme Court of these United States.

Great.

Some deluded people think that this warped and really foul brief, which is presenting a new stupid legal theory,  is somehow going to carry tremendous weight and will impact the outcome of the case. Tremendous weight for certain, but as far as actually affecting the outcome of the case I hardly think it would. Obama is basically preaching to the choir with his brief and is helping out his old chum Roberts with a potential lifesaver just in case he needs to bail out of the sinking ship of a divisive court. I would hope that such alien law theory would be rejected and be tossed into Ginsberg's fireplace to give it a nice post winter glow.

Since Obama's brief is mainly geared towards a possible emergency exit for Roberts we have to conclude that such mockery of so-called brief has no more baring on the outcome of this case than any other brief filed with the court.

But one brief actually stands out for me. Surprisingly, it was the brief from the austerity ghouls of the Austrian school of Anti-American economics think tank, the despicable libertarian Cato Institute, that should be praised because of its likely potential to have a real impact on the case. This brief was intended for none other than Kennedy, the swing vote on the court. We've already nailed positive results from the liberal fab four. We are one vote short from victory, and that vote must come from either Kennedy or Roberts. If we get both then we could rub the outcome on Brian Brown's and his molester Cardinal Tim Dolan's faces. A 6-3 victory will be a joyous occasion for the 14th amendment of the constitution.

Simply put, Kennedy listens to Cato a lot. About 95% a lot. I'm not sure how many times he's taken Obama's side, but I am guessing is not as a good relationship compared to Cato's. Kennedy is a fellow of Cato and has very close ties since Kennedy's austerity fetish has been engrained by this think tank. Meaning: he listens to them all the time. And in this case, Cato's brief is actually something to take very seriously even though their aruguments are generic, their weight with the must have swing vote is very unique and very special. Kennedy, most likely of cases, read this brief first before the others on the pile. Yup, they are that close.

And now we are that close in winning this.

Anti-Gay Bigot Lech Walesa's Rhetoric is What Many Catholic Fasicists Agree With

So we learn that this so-called Nobel Peace Prize winner for advocating democracy, and former president of Poland, Lech Walesa has said that gays are not entitled to the political process and should remain "behind a wall."

Poland is the center of Catholic universe. If you want to know how a real reactionary Catholic Papist country would look like then look no further than this former communist country. Italy is more or less "metro" when it comes to dogmatic fanaticism. Spain, Portugal, Mexico and other Latin Pan-American countries who identify with the Roman Church are doing so out of tradition and culture, not dogma. I call these countries the "virgin countries" because they have more devotion of faith to the Virgin Mary than to a troll like Ratzinger. I more or less identify myself as a "Cultural Catholic" and have no allegiance to the hermits of the Vatican who are in so far way detached from reality and their warped minds are trapped in a bubble. I don't believe that a man named Jesus came back from the dead after three days. I do, however, believe in the story of Jesus which consists of standing up to fascistic authoritarianism, corrupt clergy, exposing hypocrisy, love human beings, heal those from their own misery, help those that cannot help themselves, and fight the ravages of unnecessary poverty. This is more powerful than a man coming back from the dead three days later, in my opinion.

Jesus fought radical fascism and religious dogma of his day. And today I wish to continue that fight within and outside the church. Catholics who embrace fascism, like Walesa by denying basic democratic rights, should be ashamed of themselves and rebuked for pushing such destructive anti-human rhetoric. Today, the Church is embroiled in and plagued with homo, pedo-fascism. Pedophiles are being covered by blackmailed gay Bishops and Cardinals. (I will talk about this in detail in another post.)

And their cohorts like Rick Frothy Santorum are doing their biding. These so-called Catholics are more interested in structure than they are with substance and evidence. Santorum believes that gays have no rights as well. Regardless of what the Santorums and Walesas of the world want to tell you, they are not embracing the teachings of Jesus but rather the teachings of the Church which they themselves have written. I failed to see their ideology as teachings but more like dogma and imposition. Jesus never imposed on anybody but rather taught through examples.

For all the reasons I've already explained I cannot take fascist Cardinals, Bishops and reactionary politicians seriously after this incredible expose of dictator Walesa. These fascists (like all the rest of them in history) will twist reality and play victims in order to deceive people into embracing their horrid selfish philosophy. The Vatican run and Mormon funded NOM (National Organization for Marriage) has played this all too often by saying that reactionaries will be "prosecuted" (aka fined - so I guess every time I get a speeding ticket I should yell that I am being persecuted?) because they will be forced to "give up" their religious beliefs (aka unable to discriminate against somebody in a place of public commerce).

What is even more funnier and even pathetic is when these same Catholic American fascists file briefs against gay marriage in federal court saying that their ultimate argument is that the political process should take care of this issue and not the courts.

In the words of another Catholic fascist Antonin Scalia: 'DON'T BELIEVE IT!' (During his dissenting opinion on Lawrence v Texas). I don't believe that they believe in the babel that they are writing. You have one of these fascists declaring that gays should be barred from the political process and some others like Santorum saying that marriage "can never" be redefine for any reason, be it political will or the ballot box. So when we go to court over gay marriage, I don't feel that I owe any form of explanation as to why should end up in court. We end up in court because it is a right to sue anybody for almost any reason in this country. You even have a right to sue the president, sue the voters, sue the state, sue your mother. Our court system, though far from perfect, is pretty darn modern and advanced compared to the judiciaries of other countries.

So whenever some Catholic fascist hack tries to say that the political process is the only avenue for gays to address their grievances, just know that what they really mean is that once you are in that "political process" these bullies will be able to build a wall for us to sit behind so as to not offend their homophobic and fascistic sensitivities.

Anti-Gay Bigot With Nobel Peace Prize in Hand Must be Confronted by Obama

Since I get lectured of and on about Obama's presumed strong advocacy on LGBT issues nothing can convince more of such brazen claim if Obama takes the opportunity to do something pretty extraordinary (and without the need to capitulate to his fascist foes in the tea bagger peanut gallery) on the issue of former President of Poland Lech Walesa's rabidly anti-gay comments over the weekend. Obama is not only the leader of the free world, but also, and this the reason why I bring Obama into the mix, he is also a Nobel Laureate in the same category as the Polish sausage that cracked its casing and spewed its stinky past due filling of anti-gay bullshit.

In his absurd comments Walesa says gays have no right to the political process, should be banned from democracy and sit "behind a wall" - ironically this Geppetto look-alike was given the now worthless prize for his fight for democracy when the conservative country rightfully fought off the failed Stalinists and restored freedom and democracy. But now Walesa's aim was to only restrict this new freedom and democracy to heterosexuals of his reactionary country.

Obama should not only rebuke him, (which I think he might do if anybody of the gay base really cares about this at all) but return his Nobel prize and medal to Norway unless Norway decides to rightly rescind Walesa's prize and cross his name out of the Nobel roster. But since rescinding the prize by itself will be a very difficult task to do, Obama's attempt to give back his medal would put tremendous pressure on Norway to do the right thing and save grace (and the value of such awards) and take the award from someone who obviously got it by fraudulent means.

Although I doubt he would think about returning his pride and joy of a Nobel medal (for doing almost absolutely nothing but win an election) to support the claim of his fanatics that he's the most "pro-LGBT President in history," doing so would be a tremendous gesture that signifies the weakness of my appropriate skepticism of his so called support for the gay community and would make Walesa crave for that "wall" even more - but this time being used to shield  him from the embarrassment of having others look at him as he wets his homophobic pants.