"Social factors also play a major role in denying equal opportunity. The truth is, the greatest tool to lift children and families from poverty is one that decreases the probability of child poverty by 82%. But it isn’t a government spending program. It’s called marriage."
You see according to this nitwit all you have to do is bag (or in this case teabag) yourself a bride and BOOM! problem solved. Never mind the fact that single people without children (the majority of gays BTW) have more disposable income than those who are not. Hence, we can safely say, these single people are better off. When you get married and have children, gay or straight, you take up more financial responsibilities and logically puts a squeeze on your wallet.What Super-teabagger maniac Rubio wanted to say was that women should just marry a guy for his money and for financial support. In other words, not only should women just be barefoot and pregnant, but also be crass gold diggers.
What he didn't say, and what needs to be pointed out, is that Rubio doesn't support gay marriage at all as he follows the Tea Bible to the TEA. Following his logic, gays will be denied economic mobility because in Rubio's world they are denied marriage and in the end we will keep gays economically oppressed (besides the sociological, religious oppression we are dealing with already) through Rubio's warped unintelligent economic theory.
Hopefully we are not that stupid to actually believe the guy. Because according to him it is not economic investment in production, manufacturing, education, infrastructure, science, space, and medicine that any sane individual would agree that is the proper solution, it is to have heterosexuals getting married that would save us.
So what are you waiting for you breeders? Get busy! Get hitched and have as many babies as possible see how that works out for you.
No comments:
Post a Comment